Category Archives: United States history

NEW! Oh, Those Medicare Advantage TV Commercials (from One Not a Fan of Medicare Advantage)!




NEW! 2024 Repeats the 1963 Calendar: JFK, Oswald and Veterans Day Weekend, From Sunday, November 10 to Tuesday, November 12




NEW! About the Part D Madness in Medicare this Annual Election Period for 2025




Medicare Musings, Part Three: Myths about Medicare Advantage and Part B




NEW! My Experience Learning about Medicare’s Part D Prescription Drug Coverage




NEW! Rick Reiman Narrates Chapter 6, “The New Nation,” from “The American Yawp,” a Free OER American History Textbook




NEW! Rick Reiman Narrates Chapter 13, “The Sectional Crisis,” from the Open Source History Textbook, “The American Yawp”




Audio Narration of Chapter Two, “Colliding Cultures,” From “The American Yawp,” Narrated by Dr. Rick Reiman




NEW! Audio Narration of “The Great Depression” from the Free Open Educational Resource, “The American Yawp”




NEW! Summary of Chapter Six of “The Warren Report:” “Investigation Into Possible Conspiracy”




Announcing a New Series on my YouTube Channel, “JFK Demystified”



This is your host, historian Rick Reiman.  Go to my YouTube Channel, “JFK Demystified,” to view the first episode of a series of short videos called “On Background: Seeking the Hidden JFK Assassination.”  The series is on the evidence that is hiding in plain sight, namely the factors that block our view from the evidence that makes the assassination a simple thing to understand.  We look at the confusion regarding standards of evidence and proof, the con-men- conspiracy theories that lead people astray, the historical context that sends us back to the real world, and the accumulated evidence confirmed again and again by a series of investigation, each one clearing up the few original questions that arose from a legitimate concern that some of the evidence was hidden. It was, but it is hidden no more, a simple fact that speaks volumes about how history really works. Join me on YouTube for this series, “On Background.”  See you there.


“Into the Mind of the Assassin: Oswald’s Last Month, October-November 1963”



Continuing the series of JFK assassination episodes in this, the 60th year since the assassination, we look not at the thinking of the CIA, FBI, Warren Commission, Mob, Cuba, Russia or any of the other institutions that have been falsely imagined as being behind it, but inside the mind of the man who actually did it, and did it alone: Lee Harvey Oswald.  It may not be the most popular theory, but facts don’t have to be popular. They only need to be true.  This is an essay by myself, Rick Reiman, and narrated by myself, in response to the excellent insights of Burt Griffin, who wrote the new book, JFK, Oswald, Ruby: Politics, Prejudice and Truth. A staff member on the Warren Commission (1963-1964). Griffin challenges historians to take the assassination seriously as history, something that is simple to understand once contextualized in history.  Frankly, historians have not recognized their responsibility in this regard.  Historians, when are you going to do your jobs, and take this intersection of the Cold War and cvil rights, which is what the assassination was, seriously as history?  Until they do, this will continue to be a blot, a stain and a disgrace for the historical profession, as it has been for sixty years.

Photo taken by Marina Oswald.

Coming in March 2019: A 4-Part Podcast Series, “The Politics of Disbelief,” on “Hijacking History”



   Watch for my 4-part podcast series on “The Politics of Disbelief: America’s Response to the Holocaust, 1929-1945,” coming in March 2019.  They will be the best episodes I have created thus far.

Here is a trailer for the podcast series coming in March.

Topics covered in trailer:

  • What are the difficulties in understanding America’s role in the Holocaust?
  • How do we analyze what knowing and not knowing means in the face of the Holocaust?
  • Why will four episodes suffice to tell this story?
  • What is the thesis of David Wyman and why might the truth be different than his view?